|
Join our Newsletter and SAVE $$!
Our Customers are saying...
| |  | Oneida Flatware | Home » » » Cuisinart Chef's Classic Stainless 14-Inch Stir-Fry Pan with Helper Handle and Glass Cover | | | | | | | Description: | | Cuisinart is pleased to offer an exciting new variety of specialty pieces of Chef's Classic Stainless Cookware that make everyday cooking tasks a pleasure. | | | Features: | |
• 14-inch stir-fry pan made of 18/10 stainless steel with encapsulated aluminum core
• Stay-cool riveted handle and opposite helper handle for a secure hold
• See-through glass cover with loop handle and stainless-steel rim
• Dishwasher-safe for quick cleanup; oven-safe up to 550 degrees F
• Measures approximately 14-2/7 by 21-1/2 by 5-1/2 inches; limited lifetime warranty
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Length:
| 14.3 inches | | Product Width:
| 21.5 inches | | Product Height:
| 5.5 inches | | Product Weight:
| 7.3 pounds | | Package Length:
| 23.4 inches | | Package Width:
| 15.0 inches | | Package Height:
| 5.4 inches | | Package Weight:
| 7.4 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
|  based on 43 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
 I did not like that it is very light whige and food stickJul 16, 2010
I choose this wok because it made of stainless
But because the wok is so light the food stick and it is very hard to clean.
i gave up and got the Gourmet standard stainless 14"wok and i love it.
Very easy to clean and easy to cook. this is the only stainless wok that i found in a reasonable price.
Gourmet Standard 13 Inch Tri-Ply Wok with Rack and Domed Lid
I am realy pleased with it.Jul 12, 2010
It's a realy big, good quality wok. The only bad thing I can think of is the weight. I would prefer it to be a bit heavier. But for this price I think it's excellent...
good item at a great priceJul 12, 2010
This wok is pretty good... the quality is very good, the lid does what a lid is supposed to do, and it heats very quickly.
The down side is that the handle is a little too small for such a big wok, it loses heat very quickly (even for a stainless item), an the bottom is too flat. Traditional woks have a round bottom which make them much more useful for manipulating sauces (pool the sauce in the middle to separate from the meat and veggies) and for deep frying. I realize that round bottoms don't fare well on American cook tops, but even a little more roundness would have gone a long way.
However, I got this for thirty three dollars which more than makes up for the shortcomings.
 Great productJun 24, 2010
This replaced an older stainless steel wok that had the separate ring. This works much better for us, especially since we have an electric range. It heats evenly and cooks beautifully.
2 of 2 found the following review helpful:
Nice WOK for the priceMay 10, 2010
I've only tried the wok once, but I learned quickly that you don't want to have the heat too HOT. The shrimp I sauteed didn't stick, but the coating did. It took quite a while to finally chip off the burnt specks from the wok. I think I'll enjoy it, now that I know what temperature to use.
It's a large wok, and the lid makes it quite a deal. Others on-line were more than twice the price.
| | |
|
