|
Join our Newsletter and SAVE $$!
Our Customers are saying...
| |  | Cuisinart Cookware | Home » » » Cuisinart 635-24 Chef's Classic Nonstick Hard-Anodized 3-Quart Chef's Pan with Cover | | | | | | | Description: | | Cuisinart is pleased to offer an exciting variety of specialty pieces. Easy pouring saucepans make draining liquids simple and our gourmet pans make everyday cooking tasks a pleasure | | | Features: | |
• Hard Anodized Exterior-Dense and Highly Wear Resistant
• Quantanium Nonstick Cooking Surface for Professional Results
• Riveted Stainless handles
• Tempered Class Lids
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Length:
| 5.0 inches | | Product Width:
| 17.8 inches | | Product Height:
| 9.63 inches | | Product Weight:
| 0.0 pounds | | Package Length:
| 17.3 inches | | Package Width:
| 10.1 inches | | Package Height:
| 5.0 inches | | Package Weight:
| 3.75 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
|  based on 32 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
 ( 32 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
40 of 41 found the following review helpful:
 excellent--perfect for 2Jun 06, 2007
By David A. Smith
This pan is much thinner and lighter than, say, Calphalon commercial, but I've had no problem with food sticking. The size of the pan makes it a great mini-wok; it's 3" deep, 7" across the bottom, and 9 3/4" across the top. The bottom is flat, which I think is perfect if you want to saute onions, green peppers, etc. It has a clear glass lid with a good size handle. After years of cooking on a gas range, I now find myself cooking on one of those awful ceramic cooktops where you never know what the temp. is and things tend to boil over. Now when I cook rice--normally done in a 2 qt. pan, I use this pan because the 3 qt. size is more forgiving of boil overs. I hate ceramic/electic cooktops, but this pan makes them easier to live with. Anything you'd normally cook in a 2 qt saucepan you can cook in this pan and have a little margin for error. The 7" bottom is exactly the same size as the large burner on my ceramic cooktop. At just $30 this pan is a bargain, and I use it frequently. Get one. You'll like it.
18 of 20 found the following review helpful:
 Love the sizeNov 10, 2007
By Y. Powell
It was perfect for making 1-2 pounds of a meat dish. I use it for frying too because it is deep enough. The nonstick interior was easy to clean up and the pan felt just right. I wouldn't mind buying this again or give as a gift.
8 of 9 found the following review helpful:
 Be very carefulApr 04, 2011
By Musica
"Ann"
Too expensive. But, be very careful when placing on stove, especially gas which has an open grill. The handle is as heavy as the pot and mine has tipped over a couple of times. Make sure you have enough ingredients in pan to prevent this.
Not worth the money.
3 of 3 found the following review helpful:
GREAT 3 Quart Chef's Pan with Glass coverApr 14, 2010
By John A.
I purchased this product because "I like to see what is cooking, while I am cooking!" This has filled the bill well, no more spattering on the stove and the greatest is the fact that it cooks FAST! We like the fact that it is simple to clean!Thank you Cuisinart and AMAZON!
2 of 2 found the following review helpful:
Cuisinart Chef's Classic Nonstick 1.5 Nonstick PanJul 11, 2010
By Adrian Bailey
This is a Cuisinart 1.5 qt pan and not a 3 like they are asking me to review, but anyway, I bought it from Amazon.com and I just love it. Lid fits niceley. Let some noodles over cook the other day that I was warming up and forgot!! They weren't burn't and were not stuck to the pan. Great pan. I already own several.
See all 32 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| | |
|
