|
Join our Newsletter and SAVE $$!
Our Customers are saying...
| |  | Calphalon Cookware | Home » » » Calphalon Classic Bakeware 12-by-17-Inch Rectangular Nonstick Baking/Roasting Pan | | | | | | | Description: | | The ultimate in versatility --these pans are a must have for family dinners and pot luck's. The 12" X 17" size is ideal for roasting meats, baking party-sized cakes, or serving up a hearty helping of lasagna. With Calphalon's heavy-duty construction, this pan will last a lifetime. Our exclusive nonstick coating will ensure that whatever you bake will come out beautifully and your pan will wash up like a dream. Plus you can add the Calphalon 12" x 17" Cooling Rack to use as a roasting rack for meats and vegetables! | | | Features: | |
• Classic design for expert results
• Dishwasher safe for easy clean-up
• Folded corner design produces precise baked goods
• Professional grade construction ensures a lifetime of performance
• Reinforced nonstick is Calphalon's most durable nonstick ever
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Length:
| 17.0 inches | | Product Width:
| 12.0 inches | | Product Height:
| 3.2 inches | | Product Weight:
| 0.0 pounds | | Package Length:
| 18.1 inches | | Package Width:
| 12.6 inches | | Package Height:
| 2.8 inches | | Package Weight:
| 3.3 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
| based on 5 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
( 5 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 found the following review helpful:
Here's why I do NOT recommend this item:Feb 15, 2009
By loftylanachgo
"loftylanachgo"
1. There are seams in the corners which are VERY difficult to clean. 2. After using this pan only 5 times, it discolored.
I'm sorry I bought this particular brand/design in 3 sizes. :(
6 of 6 found the following review helpful:
Not so greatMay 20, 2009
By A. Dove The corners have seams which trap food easily. It is VERY difficult to clean--I have to use toothpicks to get the corners clean. In addition the pan stains easily and no amount of scrubbing can eliminate the stains. Would NOT recommend. There are surely better pans out there. The only impressive thing about this pan is its hefty weight. Other than that, don't bother with it.
4 of 4 found the following review helpful:
excellent panJul 12, 2007
By Shane Schofield I bought this pan to replace one that I ruined which belonged to a friend. After giving t to him, a week later he asked if I wanted to ruin more of his cookware for him. He loves it.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
Great buyAug 23, 2010
By Holly65 Contrary to a few other reviews out there, I found this pan to be great for the 50th birthday cake that I baked for my husband. I had no problems with anything sticking to the sides of the pan - in fact the cake came out quite easily and cleaned up just fine.
Not what I would consider the correct sizeJan 27, 2012
By Daniel M. Pomerantz
"dmp"
When I purchased this item, I already owned a Calphalon 12x17 "Jelly Roll Pan" and a Silpat E04 11.5x16.5 mat. The Jelly Roll Pan is good quality and actually measures 11.5x16.5 internally at the bottom, and the Silpat fits perfectly. I have had the occasion to want a deep baking pan with the Silpat and was delighted to see that Calphalon makes a 12x17 deep baking pan. I presumed that the two 12x17 pans would be the same size. When I received it, I immediately found that the Silpat would not fit and that the inside bottom of this pan is closer to 11.25x16.75. I'm not sure if this is a standard baking nominal size, but I will be returning the baking pan.
| | |
|